Today, counter-terrorism and countering violent extremism are being used to target and attack civic space across the globe.
Arbitrary detention.
Physical harassment.
Surveillance.
Enforced disappearances.
Criminalization.
Discrimination.
Threats.
Intimidation.
Killings.
Digital Surveillance.
Criminalization.
Discrimination.
Threats.
Intimidation.
Killings.
Digital Surveillance.
Arbitrary detention.
Physical harassment.
Surveillance.
Enforced disappearances.
Digital Surveillance.
Killings.
Intimidation.
Threats.
Discrimination.
Enforced disappearances.
Surveillance.
Physical harassment.
Arbitrary detention.
01 / 08In the aftermath of 9/11, the international community through the UN Security Council enacted a zero-risk approach to counter-terrorism.
02 / 08Before that, Member States adopted counter-terrorism treaties and used domestic law to regulate terrorism.
03 / 08These treaties defined terrorist acts under international law and integrated concrete frameworks for human rights.
04 / 08After 9/11, States and transnational bodies gained extensive powers to define and combat terrorism and violent extremism.
05 / 08These powers emboldened the security sector and executive branch in many countries.
06 / 08Member States also reshaped the internal architecture and priorities of the UN.
07 / 08With no globally-agreed definition of terrorism, States have unilateral power to define who is a terrorist or extremist often without consequence.
The misuse of counter-terrorism is not limited to a country or region.
Over the last twenty years, Governments have conflated terrorism with broader issues of national security which is then used as a convenient justification to stifle dissidents.